Judicial Reasoning and the Views of Jerome Frank and Karl Llewellyn

Number of Pages 8

In eight pages this paper examines the theoretical perspectives of persuasion, doctrine development and constitutionality as conceptualized by Jerome Frank and Karl Llewellyn and the distinctions between them as evidenced in the United States v. Oliver, United States v. Rhodes, and the United States v. Black.


File: MH11_MHllew.wps


Send me this paper »

« Back to Topic Listings

Copyright © 1994-2025 The Paper Store Enterprises, Inc. & Research Papers Online. All rights reserved.